5/16/2023 0 Comments Institutionalized zombie craft![]() Ces derniers sont particulièrement difficiles, car ils ne correspondent pas à nos attentes en termes d'institutions. Tandis que les principales OI sont dissoutes bien moins fréquemment que des OI moins importantes, cet article identifie néanmoins 21 cas de disparition d'OI principales depuis 1815. Cet article analyse les limites de la persistance des institutions en se concentrant sur des cas particuliers. ![]() ![]() Pour expliquer leur longévité, les chercheurs ont avancé des arguments institutionnels concernant les coûts de remplacement et les actifs de l'institution, mais aussi la capacité des OI à s'adapter et à résister aux défis. Les principales organisations internationales (OI) sont fortement contestées, mais rarement dissoutes. This article refines theories of institutional stickiness and contributes to the institutional theory of the life and death of IOs. These cases show the limits of the institutional theories of IO stickiness: sometimes member states find high replacement costs justified or consider assets as sunk costs, and IOs may lack agency to strategically respond. To better understand these rare but important events, the article provides case illustrations from the League of Nations and International Refugee Organization, which were dissolved due to their perceived underperformance and a disappearing demand for cooperation. These are tough cases as they do not conform to our institutionalist expectations. While major IOs are dissolved at considerably lower rates than minor IOs, the article nevertheless identifies twenty-one cases where major IOs have died since 1815. This article analyzes the limits of institutional stickiness by focusing on outlier cases. Scholars have focused on their longevity, making institutional arguments about replacement costs and institutional assets as well as IO agency to adapt and resist challenges. ![]() Major international organizations (IOs) are heavily contested, but they are rarely dissolved. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |